<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (4) TMI 49 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168659</link>
    <description>For depreciation under the Indian Income-tax Act, actual cost is the full cost incurred in installing service connections, and consumer contributions do not reduce that cost; the expenditure is treated as capital expenditure because it creates an enduring asset for the electricity business. A question not raised before the appellate authority or tribunal cannot be answered in reference jurisdiction under Section 66(2), because it must arise out of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (4) TMI 49 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168659</link>
      <description>For depreciation under the Indian Income-tax Act, actual cost is the full cost incurred in installing service connections, and consumer contributions do not reduce that cost; the expenditure is treated as capital expenditure because it creates an enduring asset for the electricity business. A question not raised before the appellate authority or tribunal cannot be answered in reference jurisdiction under Section 66(2), because it must arise out of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>