<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner, Invalidates Rejection of VCES Application Due to Undisclosed Tax Liability in ST 3 Returns.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22162</link>
    <description>Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) - petitioner pointed out that though ST 3 returns were filed earlier but they are eligible for the scheme as true liability was not disclosed at the time of filing of ST 3 returns - rejection of application of VCS is not valid - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:28:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:28:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner, Invalidates Rejection of VCES Application Due to Undisclosed Tax Liability in ST 3 Returns.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22162</link>
      <description>Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) - petitioner pointed out that though ST 3 returns were filed earlier but they are eligible for the scheme as true liability was not disclosed at the time of filing of ST 3 returns - rejection of application of VCS is not valid - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:28:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>