<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (2) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168640</link>
    <description>Procedural notice defects did not invalidate the special general meeting because all councillors had notice of the time, place and business, no prejudice was shown, quorum was present, and the notice requirements were treated as directory in the circumstances. A councillor walkout and the absence of the public did not affect validity. The later amending legislation was read as a curative and validating enactment, expressly deeming elections to the offices of President and Vice-President held within the relevant period to be valid and extending to pending proceedings. On that construction, irregularities arising from the pre-amendment position stood cured and the elections were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (2) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168640</link>
      <description>Procedural notice defects did not invalidate the special general meeting because all councillors had notice of the time, place and business, no prejudice was shown, quorum was present, and the notice requirements were treated as directory in the circumstances. A councillor walkout and the absence of the public did not affect validity. The later amending legislation was read as a curative and validating enactment, expressly deeming elections to the offices of President and Vice-President held within the relevant period to be valid and extending to pending proceedings. On that construction, irregularities arising from the pre-amendment position stood cured and the elections were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>