<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 604 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to exclude seven disputed comparables in the transfer pricing analysis for a software development company. This exclusion provided relief to the assessee by emphasizing the importance of functional similarity in selecting comparables. The appeal was partly allowed, highlighting the significance of consistency with previous rulings in transfer pricing matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 604 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to exclude seven disputed comparables in the transfer pricing analysis for a software development company. This exclusion provided relief to the assessee by emphasizing the importance of functional similarity in selecting comparables. The appeal was partly allowed, highlighting the significance of consistency with previous rulings in transfer pricing matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>