https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168638 Where title to the premises was found to vest in the respondent by succession and the occupants were held to be in unauthorised occupation, the factual findings of the courts below were treated as binding. On that basis, the Civil Court was held to have jurisdiction to order eviction, and no substantial question of law arose for interference in second appeal. The High Court's refusal to disturb those findings was therefore sustained and the challenge failed. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168638 Where title to the premises was found to vest in the respondent by succession and the occupants were held to be in unauthorised occupation, the factual findings of the courts below were treated as binding. On that basis, the Civil Court was held to have jurisdiction to order eviction, and no substantial question of law arose for interference in second appeal. The High Court's refusal to disturb those findings was therefore sustained and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168638