<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168635</link>
    <description>The Employees&#039; Provident Funds Act validly delegates power to extend coverage to additional establishments because its policy and standards confine that power, while exemptions require employee benefits no less favourable than those under the Act. The Act applies to salaried employees as well as wage-earners, since it makes no distinction between salary and wages and defines basic wages broadly. Exemptions for co-operative societies and newly established undertakings rest on intelligible differentia and rational legislative purpose; they therefore do not offend Article 14. The constitutional challenge to the notifications, scheme and enabling provisions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 55 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168635</link>
      <description>The Employees&#039; Provident Funds Act validly delegates power to extend coverage to additional establishments because its policy and standards confine that power, while exemptions require employee benefits no less favourable than those under the Act. The Act applies to salaried employees as well as wage-earners, since it makes no distinction between salary and wages and defines basic wages broadly. Exemptions for co-operative societies and newly established undertakings rest on intelligible differentia and rational legislative purpose; they therefore do not offend Article 14. The constitutional challenge to the notifications, scheme and enabling provisions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>