https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168632 Concurrent findings on possession of land in the relevant Fasli year were treated as findings of fact, and appellate interference was permitted only where the finding was perverse or unsupported by evidence. The record showed cogent reasons for rejecting the claim of possession, and no material basis was established to treat the finding as based on no evidence. The factual finding was therefore upheld, and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:18:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168632 Concurrent findings on possession of land in the relevant Fasli year were treated as findings of fact, and appellate interference was permitted only where the finding was perverse or unsupported by evidence. The record showed cogent reasons for rejecting the claim of possession, and no material basis was established to treat the finding as based on no evidence. The factual finding was therefore upheld, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168632