<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 591 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257657</link>
    <description>The Central Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the value of carton boxes could not be included in the assessed amount for excise duty calculation. The Court dismissed the case regarding the inclusion of packing cost in the assessable value, emphasizing that each case must be decided based on whether goods are generally sold in the wholesale market at the &quot;factory gate.&quot; The Court found that the containers were placed in paper cartons for transportation from the factory gate in the first case, leading to the dismissal of the case. In the second case, wooden packing was deemed unnecessary for sale at the factory gate, resulting in the dismissal of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 591 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257657</link>
      <description>The Central Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the value of carton boxes could not be included in the assessed amount for excise duty calculation. The Court dismissed the case regarding the inclusion of packing cost in the assessable value, emphasizing that each case must be decided based on whether goods are generally sold in the wholesale market at the &quot;factory gate.&quot; The Court found that the containers were placed in paper cartons for transportation from the factory gate in the first case, leading to the dismissal of the case. In the second case, wooden packing was deemed unnecessary for sale at the factory gate, resulting in the dismissal of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>