https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257651 The court initially ordered the winding up of the company due to non-payment of a substantial amount. However, after the company applied for a recall of the winding-up orders and complied with depositing the entire amount, the court permanently stayed the winding-up order. The court highlighted a dispute over the occupation of premises and found the non-disclosure of a crucial letter by the petitioning creditor to be fatal to its claim. The court determined that the matter required further investigation and allowed the petitioning creditor to pursue other legal remedies. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257651 The court initially ordered the winding up of the company due to non-payment of a substantial amount. However, after the company applied for a recall of the winding-up orders and complied with depositing the entire amount, the court permanently stayed the winding-up order. The court highlighted a dispute over the occupation of premises and found the non-disclosure of a crucial letter by the petitioning creditor to be fatal to its claim. The court determined that the matter required further investigation and allowed the petitioning creditor to pursue other legal remedies. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257651