<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 582 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257648</link>
    <description>Professional misconduct findings by statutory disciplinary authorities were upheld where the complaint, inquiry and Council review followed the prescribed procedure and the record supported the conclusions. The Court accepted that the respondent had improperly filed documents before the Registrar of Companies, signed balance sheets without a valid auditor appointment and acted inconsistently with professional duties. It also reaffirmed that disciplinary findings of expert professional bodies carry great weight and will be disturbed only for a gross breach of the Act, the Regulations or principles of fairness. The recommendation to remove the respondent from membership for six months was therefore accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 582 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257648</link>
      <description>Professional misconduct findings by statutory disciplinary authorities were upheld where the complaint, inquiry and Council review followed the prescribed procedure and the record supported the conclusions. The Court accepted that the respondent had improperly filed documents before the Registrar of Companies, signed balance sheets without a valid auditor appointment and acted inconsistently with professional duties. It also reaffirmed that disciplinary findings of expert professional bodies carry great weight and will be disturbed only for a gross breach of the Act, the Regulations or principles of fairness. The recommendation to remove the respondent from membership for six months was therefore accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>