https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257647 The tribunal found that the appellant had indeed cooperated by submitting the required documents for audit, as evidenced by an acknowledged letter. As a result, the penalty imposed for alleged non-cooperation under Section 77(1)(c) of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential relief. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:54:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257647 The tribunal found that the appellant had indeed cooperated by submitting the required documents for audit, as evidenced by an acknowledged letter. As a result, the penalty imposed for alleged non-cooperation under Section 77(1)(c) of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257647