<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 154 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168618</link>
    <description>Annual value for municipal rate purposes is the gross rent the premises might reasonably fetch, but where rent control applies, statutory standard rent fixes the ceiling even if no controller&#039;s order has yet been made. The assessment therefore had to remain within the standard rent under the rent control law. Rent received by a tenant from sub-tenants was irrelevant because the valuation test looks to what the owner could reasonably obtain in an open-market letting, not downstream sub-letting receipts. Likewise, gradations of ownership affected only apportionment of liability, not valuation; rent receivable by a subordinate owner did not enter the computation of annual value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 154 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168618</link>
      <description>Annual value for municipal rate purposes is the gross rent the premises might reasonably fetch, but where rent control applies, statutory standard rent fixes the ceiling even if no controller&#039;s order has yet been made. The assessment therefore had to remain within the standard rent under the rent control law. Rent received by a tenant from sub-tenants was irrelevant because the valuation test looks to what the owner could reasonably obtain in an open-market letting, not downstream sub-letting receipts. Likewise, gradations of ownership affected only apportionment of liability, not valuation; rent receivable by a subordinate owner did not enter the computation of annual value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>