<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 564 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, operates retrospectively from April 1, 2005. Consequently, if tax deducted at source (TDS) is paid by the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1), no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should occur. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s claim for commission and interest expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 564 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010, operates retrospectively from April 1, 2005. Consequently, if tax deducted at source (TDS) is paid by the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1), no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should occur. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s claim for commission and interest expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>