<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 558 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal without the requirement of predeposit, permitting the case to proceed for hearing. The issue revolved around the taxability of services provided by the appellant, particularly concerning the transfer of imported software and non-payment of service tax on defective software returned. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s statements regarding service tax liability and directed the Revenue to verify payments made for defective software. Ultimately, based on evidence presented, the tax demand was deemed unsustainable, leading to the order being set aside, with the appeal allowed and related applications disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 558 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal without the requirement of predeposit, permitting the case to proceed for hearing. The issue revolved around the taxability of services provided by the appellant, particularly concerning the transfer of imported software and non-payment of service tax on defective software returned. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s statements regarding service tax liability and directed the Revenue to verify payments made for defective software. Ultimately, based on evidence presented, the tax demand was deemed unsustainable, leading to the order being set aside, with the appeal allowed and related applications disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>