https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257617 Confiscation of exported goods was sustained because the appellant's own admission established that the goods were non-basmati rice. On those facts, the monetary consequences were found excessive, as the goods had already been taken back to town, and the redemption fine and penalty were moderated. The confiscation order remained undisturbed, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced on factual grounds. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:41:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257617 Confiscation of exported goods was sustained because the appellant's own admission established that the goods were non-basmati rice. On those facts, the monetary consequences were found excessive, as the goods had already been taken back to town, and the redemption fine and penalty were moderated. The confiscation order remained undisturbed, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced on factual grounds. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257617