<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257616</link>
    <description>The court set aside the CLB&#039;s interim order, emphasizing that CLB&#039;s powers under section 247(1A) should be exercised only in relation to the company subject to proceedings before it. The court directed the CLB to decide pending applications in accordance with the law and principles of natural justice, highlighting that directions must comply with procedural propriety and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257616</link>
      <description>The court set aside the CLB&#039;s interim order, emphasizing that CLB&#039;s powers under section 247(1A) should be exercised only in relation to the company subject to proceedings before it. The court directed the CLB to decide pending applications in accordance with the law and principles of natural justice, highlighting that directions must comply with procedural propriety and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>