https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257614 The Court ruled in favor of the defendants, rejecting the plaintiffs' suit under Order 23 of the CPC. The plaintiffs' claims were deemed barred as they had abandoned similar reliefs in previous Company Law Board proceedings without obtaining unconditional leave to file a fresh suit. The Court found that allowing the suit to proceed would constitute an abuse of process of law. As a result, the plaint in CS No. 319 of 2013 was rejected against defendant nos. 12, 13, and 14, and the plaintiffs' request for a stay was denied. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257614 The Court ruled in favor of the defendants, rejecting the plaintiffs' suit under Order 23 of the CPC. The plaintiffs' claims were deemed barred as they had abandoned similar reliefs in previous Company Law Board proceedings without obtaining unconditional leave to file a fresh suit. The Court found that allowing the suit to proceed would constitute an abuse of process of law. As a result, the plaint in CS No. 319 of 2013 was rejected against defendant nos. 12, 13, and 14, and the plaintiffs' request for a stay was denied. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257614