https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168617 False representation may be inferred from the totality of conduct in a cheating analysis, including inducement based on a claimed right to carry on business. Speculative forward dealings are discussed as falling within a regulatory statute aimed at preventing abuse in forward trading, with purposive construction used to bring such contracts within the definition of forward contracts. A language irregularity in recording evidence does not vitiate the trial absent demonstrated prejudice, and multiple connected acts forming one transaction may be joined in a single charge under criminal procedure rules. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:16:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168617 False representation may be inferred from the totality of conduct in a cheating analysis, including inducement based on a claimed right to carry on business. Speculative forward dealings are discussed as falling within a regulatory statute aimed at preventing abuse in forward trading, with purposive construction used to bring such contracts within the definition of forward contracts. A language irregularity in recording evidence does not vitiate the trial absent demonstrated prejudice, and multiple connected acts forming one transaction may be joined in a single charge under criminal procedure rules. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168617