https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168610 Earlier inams legislation was treated as continuing in force after the later abolition law was struck down, because the void later enactment could not undo the prior vesting of the inams in the Government. The abkari and tree-related rights attached to the inam lands were construed as appurtenant to the grant, so they vested in the State along with the inam lands on abolition. The compensation scheme was therefore held to cover those attached rights without separate compensation, and the abolition measure was upheld as constitutionally valid as agrarian reform. The appeal failed and the dismissal of the suit was sustained. en-us Thu, 02 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:08:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168610 Earlier inams legislation was treated as continuing in force after the later abolition law was struck down, because the void later enactment could not undo the prior vesting of the inams in the Government. The abkari and tree-related rights attached to the inam lands were construed as appurtenant to the grant, so they vested in the State along with the inam lands on abolition. The compensation scheme was therefore held to cover those attached rights without separate compensation, and the abolition measure was upheld as constitutionally valid as agrarian reform. The appeal failed and the dismissal of the suit was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168610