https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168608 The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was not entitled to appointment based on his position in the merit list, and the "carry forward" rules of 1952 and 1955 were either non-existent or invalid. The court did not award any costs. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:33:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168608 The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was not entitled to appointment based on his position in the merit list, and the "carry forward" rules of 1952 and 1955 were either non-existent or invalid. The court did not award any costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168608