<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (12) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168607</link>
    <description>Constitutional limits on restrictions of medicinal advertising centre on the prevention of harmful self-medication and self-treatment. Commercial advertisements promoting medicines for specified diseases are treated as outside the core protection for expression where restrictions serve the general public interest. Delegated authority to add diseases or conditions to regulatory controls requires intelligible criteria and guiding standards; uncontrolled delegation is constitutionally vulnerable, while severable valid provisions may continue to operate. Seizure and detention powers affecting documents or goods require adequate procedural safeguards, and an inseverable excessive power may be invalid. The regulatory framework is therefore sustained in substance, subject to limits on unguided delegation and coercive enforcement powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:46:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (12) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168607</link>
      <description>Constitutional limits on restrictions of medicinal advertising centre on the prevention of harmful self-medication and self-treatment. Commercial advertisements promoting medicines for specified diseases are treated as outside the core protection for expression where restrictions serve the general public interest. Delegated authority to add diseases or conditions to regulatory controls requires intelligible criteria and guiding standards; uncontrolled delegation is constitutionally vulnerable, while severable valid provisions may continue to operate. Seizure and detention powers affecting documents or goods require adequate procedural safeguards, and an inseverable excessive power may be invalid. The regulatory framework is therefore sustained in substance, subject to limits on unguided delegation and coercive enforcement powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>