<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 525 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257590</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST due to the appellant&#039;s failure to fulfill essential conditions outlined in the notification, such as filing required declarations, obtaining a service tax code, and submitting refund claims within the specified timeframe. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of procedural errors, the tribunal deemed the conditions as substantive and necessary for refund approval. The appellant&#039;s lack of diligence in meeting these requirements led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing non-compliance with procedural obligations as the basis for the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 525 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257590</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST due to the appellant&#039;s failure to fulfill essential conditions outlined in the notification, such as filing required declarations, obtaining a service tax code, and submitting refund claims within the specified timeframe. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of procedural errors, the tribunal deemed the conditions as substantive and necessary for refund approval. The appellant&#039;s lack of diligence in meeting these requirements led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing non-compliance with procedural obligations as the basis for the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>