https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257586 In a joint development arrangement, the Karnataka High Court held that the land value issue for tax on transfer of goods in execution of a works contract was already covered by the Supreme Court precedent and answered it against the State. The wider questions arising from the joint development agreement and the works contract tax liability were remitted to the Tribunal for decision on merits. The controversy also involved the meaning of sale under Section 2(29) of the KVAT Act, 2003 and the reference to barter, but the decisive ruling was confined to the land value question. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:10:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257586 In a joint development arrangement, the Karnataka High Court held that the land value issue for tax on transfer of goods in execution of a works contract was already covered by the Supreme Court precedent and answered it against the State. The wider questions arising from the joint development agreement and the works contract tax liability were remitted to the Tribunal for decision on merits. The controversy also involved the meaning of sale under Section 2(29) of the KVAT Act, 2003 and the reference to barter, but the decisive ruling was confined to the land value question. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257586