https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257585 A writ challenge to an assessment-related order was declined because the petitioner had already invoked the rectification remedy under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and that application was pending. The Court held that setting aside the order in writ proceedings on the same ground would render the rectification process infructuous, and it found the impugned order to be a detailed order not warranting interference under Article 226. It nevertheless directed the authority to dispose of the pending representation and rectification application after granting personal hearing. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257585 A writ challenge to an assessment-related order was declined because the petitioner had already invoked the rectification remedy under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and that application was pending. The Court held that setting aside the order in writ proceedings on the same ground would render the rectification process infructuous, and it found the impugned order to be a detailed order not warranting interference under Article 226. It nevertheless directed the authority to dispose of the pending representation and rectification application after granting personal hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257585