https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168593 Amended revisional jurisdiction under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1965 was held not to apply to a revision already pending in the High Court where the appellate order had become final under the unamended law. The enlargement of the High Court's power from the limited supervisory jurisdiction under section 115 CPC was treated as substantive in these circumstances because it would reopen a matter already finally decided. As the amendment contained no express words or necessary implication giving it retrospective effect, the finality of the appellate order was preserved and the High Court could not interfere under the amended provision. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:47:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168593 Amended revisional jurisdiction under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1965 was held not to apply to a revision already pending in the High Court where the appellate order had become final under the unamended law. The enlargement of the High Court's power from the limited supervisory jurisdiction under section 115 CPC was treated as substantive in these circumstances because it would reopen a matter already finally decided. As the amendment contained no express words or necessary implication giving it retrospective effect, the finality of the appellate order was preserved and the High Court could not interfere under the amended provision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168593