<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 502 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257567</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on capitalized share issuance expenses was rightly disallowed. The court concluded that such expenses should be amortized under Section 35D, not depreciated under Section 32. The court answered the referred questions in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, thereby disposing of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 502 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257567</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on capitalized share issuance expenses was rightly disallowed. The court concluded that such expenses should be amortized under Section 35D, not depreciated under Section 32. The court answered the referred questions in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, thereby disposing of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>