https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257563 The Court upheld the Assessee's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90. It ruled in favor of the Assessee on all issues raised, including the valuation of closing stock discrepancy and differences, disallowance of quality control expenses, and commission paid for Government orders. The Court found no illegality or arbitrariness in the Assessee's methods, dismissing the appeal as lacking merit and upholding decisions in favor of the Assessee. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:17:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257563 The Court upheld the Assessee's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90. It ruled in favor of the Assessee on all issues raised, including the valuation of closing stock discrepancy and differences, disallowance of quality control expenses, and commission paid for Government orders. The Court found no illegality or arbitrariness in the Assessee's methods, dismissing the appeal as lacking merit and upholding decisions in favor of the Assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257563