<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 487 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions under Sections 2(22)(e) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It ruled that deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) could only be taxed in the hands of the registered shareholder and that disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to amounts already paid during the financial year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 487 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions under Sections 2(22)(e) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It ruled that deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) could only be taxed in the hands of the registered shareholder and that disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to amounts already paid during the financial year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>