<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 481 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257545</link>
    <description>The court ordered the release of the petitioner&#039;s bank account from attachment, subject to the condition that the petitioner would deposit a further sum of Rs. 26 lakhs in addition to the already deposited Rs. 34 lakhs. The court clarified that while the attachment on other properties of the petitioner company would continue, no further coercive action would be taken by the respondents authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 481 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257545</link>
      <description>The court ordered the release of the petitioner&#039;s bank account from attachment, subject to the condition that the petitioner would deposit a further sum of Rs. 26 lakhs in addition to the already deposited Rs. 34 lakhs. The court clarified that while the attachment on other properties of the petitioner company would continue, no further coercive action would be taken by the respondents authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>