<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 475 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257539</link>
    <description>Vend fee collected by a wholesaler was treated as outside the assessee&#039;s turnover, so the related sales tax and penalty on that component could not survive. Purchase tax under section 7A, however, remained leviable on empty bottles purchased from unregistered dealers, and the Tribunal&#039;s view on that point was upheld. Penalty under section 12(3) and section 12(5)(iii) was not sustainable where the assessee&#039;s stand arose from a bona fide and long-standing legal controversy, with no conscious concealment or deliberate misstatement. The revisions therefore succeeded only in part, with vend fee-related levy and penalty set aside and section 7A liability sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 07:03:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 475 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257539</link>
      <description>Vend fee collected by a wholesaler was treated as outside the assessee&#039;s turnover, so the related sales tax and penalty on that component could not survive. Purchase tax under section 7A, however, remained leviable on empty bottles purchased from unregistered dealers, and the Tribunal&#039;s view on that point was upheld. Penalty under section 12(3) and section 12(5)(iii) was not sustainable where the assessee&#039;s stand arose from a bona fide and long-standing legal controversy, with no conscious concealment or deliberate misstatement. The revisions therefore succeeded only in part, with vend fee-related levy and penalty set aside and section 7A liability sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>