https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257530 The Tribunal held that the appellants, despite confusion and conflicting advice, had fulfilled conditions for importing spare parts for engine repair and export under the correct notification and procedure. As the primary objective was met, the appellants were not required to make a pre-deposit, and a stay against recovery was granted pending appeal. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Mar 2015 07:02:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257530 The Tribunal held that the appellants, despite confusion and conflicting advice, had fulfilled conditions for importing spare parts for engine repair and export under the correct notification and procedure. As the primary objective was met, the appellants were not required to make a pre-deposit, and a stay against recovery was granted pending appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257530