<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the receipt from the transfer of goodwill was a capital receipt taxable under &quot;Capital Gains,&quot; not as business income under section 28(va). The judgment emphasized the distinction between transferring business rights and ceasing business activities for tax purposes, citing legal precedent and relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the receipt from the transfer of goodwill was a capital receipt taxable under &quot;Capital Gains,&quot; not as business income under section 28(va). The judgment emphasized the distinction between transferring business rights and ceasing business activities for tax purposes, citing legal precedent and relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>