<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Place of Removable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108253</link>
    <description>CESTAT has held that freight charged separately in the invoice is not includible in the transaction/assessable value; Finance Bill 2015 contains no amendment to the definition of Place of Removal that changes this. However, if the sale is on FOR Destination terms, freight is part of the transaction value and would be subject to excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Place of Removable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108253</link>
      <description>CESTAT has held that freight charged separately in the invoice is not includible in the transaction/assessable value; Finance Bill 2015 contains no amendment to the definition of Place of Removal that changes this. However, if the sale is on FOR Destination terms, freight is part of the transaction value and would be subject to excise duty.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:23:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>