<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 62 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168581</link>
    <description>Income received by trustees from trust property, business or shares is not to be taxed by ignoring the special scheme for trustees. Section 3 is the charging provision, but sections 9, 10 and 12 govern computation under the relevant heads, while section 41 requires tax to be levied and recovered from trustees only in the like manner and to the same amount as from the beneficiaries. The trustees&#039; liability cannot exceed that of the beneficiaries, and the tax authority cannot bypass section 41 once the assessee is assessed in the character of a trustee. Earlier statements suggesting a departmental option were treated as obiter and not accepted as correct law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:53:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 62 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168581</link>
      <description>Income received by trustees from trust property, business or shares is not to be taxed by ignoring the special scheme for trustees. Section 3 is the charging provision, but sections 9, 10 and 12 govern computation under the relevant heads, while section 41 requires tax to be levied and recovered from trustees only in the like manner and to the same amount as from the beneficiaries. The trustees&#039; liability cannot exceed that of the beneficiaries, and the tax authority cannot bypass section 41 once the assessee is assessed in the character of a trustee. Earlier statements suggesting a departmental option were treated as obiter and not accepted as correct law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>