https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168579 Certiorari under Article 226 is limited to jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or a manifest error apparent on the face of the record, and it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or substitute an appellate review. In this election dispute, limitation was computed by excluding the publication date of the notice on election expenses, so the petition was treated as in time, and an amendment adding an alternative prayer did not introduce a new case. The Tribunal's findings on pleaded matters, corrupt practice, and the basis for declaring the petitioner elected were treated as supported by the record. The High Court's writ interference was therefore unsustainable. en-us Wed, 05 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:44:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168579 Certiorari under Article 226 is limited to jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or a manifest error apparent on the face of the record, and it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or substitute an appellate review. In this election dispute, limitation was computed by excluding the publication date of the notice on election expenses, so the petition was treated as in time, and an amendment adding an alternative prayer did not introduce a new case. The Tribunal's findings on pleaded matters, corrupt practice, and the basis for declaring the petitioner elected were treated as supported by the record. The High Court's writ interference was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168579