https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168578 A writ petition under Article 226 raising important legal questions on undisputed facts should not be dismissed summarily without a reasoned adjudication on merits. The proper course is to hear the parties and dispose of the matter by a speaking order where the issues are substantial, including questions relating to forest notifications and mandamus. The High Court's summary dismissal was therefore held unjustified, the matter was remitted for reconsideration, and the petition was required to be decided afresh in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:29:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168578 A writ petition under Article 226 raising important legal questions on undisputed facts should not be dismissed summarily without a reasoned adjudication on merits. The proper course is to hear the parties and dispose of the matter by a speaking order where the issues are substantial, including questions relating to forest notifications and mandamus. The High Court's summary dismissal was therefore held unjustified, the matter was remitted for reconsideration, and the petition was required to be decided afresh in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168578