https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257501 The court upheld the conditional order of stay issued by the Tribunal, requiring the petitioner to deposit a specified amount by a deadline. Despite noting deficiencies in the Tribunal's consideration of the limitation period and lack of findings on suppression or misrepresentation, the court did not interfere with the order. The petitioner was given an extension to make the required payment, with the understanding that compliance would allow the appeal to proceed for a full hearing on its merits. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:07:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257501 The court upheld the conditional order of stay issued by the Tribunal, requiring the petitioner to deposit a specified amount by a deadline. Despite noting deficiencies in the Tribunal's consideration of the limitation period and lack of findings on suppression or misrepresentation, the court did not interfere with the order. The petitioner was given an extension to make the required payment, with the understanding that compliance would allow the appeal to proceed for a full hearing on its merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257501