<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 35 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168575</link>
    <description>The court determined that the properties bequeathed to defendant No. 1 by his father were self-acquired and not ancestral. The will explicitly granted absolute rights to the sons, indicating the properties&#039; self-acquired nature. Consequently, the plaintiff&#039;s claim for partition was dismissed, the appeal was allowed, and judgments of lower courts were set aside. Each party was directed to bear their own costs due to the legal issue&#039;s complexity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 35 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168575</link>
      <description>The court determined that the properties bequeathed to defendant No. 1 by his father were self-acquired and not ancestral. The will explicitly granted absolute rights to the sons, indicating the properties&#039; self-acquired nature. Consequently, the plaintiff&#039;s claim for partition was dismissed, the appeal was allowed, and judgments of lower courts were set aside. Each party was directed to bear their own costs due to the legal issue&#039;s complexity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>