<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 426 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeal) for further consideration, emphasizing the need for natural justice and granting a reconciliation opportunity to the appellant in a CENVAT credit dispute. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and ensuring both parties have the chance to address discrepancies and present relevant evidence, aiming to uphold principles of natural justice in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 426 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeal) for further consideration, emphasizing the need for natural justice and granting a reconciliation opportunity to the appellant in a CENVAT credit dispute. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and ensuring both parties have the chance to address discrepancies and present relevant evidence, aiming to uphold principles of natural justice in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>