<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s oversight on unexplained credit u/s 68 criticized; CIT(A) faulted for inadequate resolution.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22090</link>
    <description>Unexplained credit u/s 68 - The AO here may have failed to discharge his obligation to conduct a proper inquiry to take the matter to logical conclusion. But CIT(A), having noticed want of proper inquiry, could not have closed the chapter simply by allowing the appeal and deleting the additions made - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:13:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:13:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s oversight on unexplained credit u/s 68 criticized; CIT(A) faulted for inadequate resolution.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22090</link>
      <description>Unexplained credit u/s 68 - The AO here may have failed to discharge his obligation to conduct a proper inquiry to take the matter to logical conclusion. But CIT(A), having noticed want of proper inquiry, could not have closed the chapter simply by allowing the appeal and deleting the additions made - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:13:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>