https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168573 Land placed by Government at the disposal of a trust under a statutory scheme did not transfer ownership where the arrangement preserved Government control, required sanction for alienation, and authorised the trust only to hold and manage the estate on Government's behalf. In that context, "vest" was treated as indicating limited possession or control for a statutory purpose, not full title. Market structures erected by the trust on such land with Government funds were also treated as Government property. On that basis, the premises fell within the Government property exclusion and were outside the rent control statute's operation. en-us Tue, 06 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168573 Land placed by Government at the disposal of a trust under a statutory scheme did not transfer ownership where the arrangement preserved Government control, required sanction for alienation, and authorised the trust only to hold and manage the estate on Government's behalf. In that context, "vest" was treated as indicating limited possession or control for a statutory purpose, not full title. Market structures erected by the trust on such land with Government funds were also treated as Government property. On that basis, the premises fell within the Government property exclusion and were outside the rent control statute's operation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Nov 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168573