<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 411 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257475</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court directed the respondents to return the seized amount of Rs. 1,18,87,490 to the petitioner within four weeks as the assessment order did not prove the amount belonged to the petitioner&#039;s clients. The High Court&#039;s order for inquiry and verification had expired three years ago. The special leave petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 411 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257475</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court directed the respondents to return the seized amount of Rs. 1,18,87,490 to the petitioner within four weeks as the assessment order did not prove the amount belonged to the petitioner&#039;s clients. The High Court&#039;s order for inquiry and verification had expired three years ago. The special leave petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>