<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 401 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257465</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s transfer-pricing contentions: OP/total-cost PLI was fixed at 9% (not 6.88%). Several alleged comparables were excluded for lack of functional similarity or segmental data, while one comparable was retained; transfer-pricing addition was restricted to Rs. 17,32,27,953. For international support-services the Tribunal found the prices were at arm&#039;s length and disallowed adjustment. On Sec.10A deductions the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s employee-count basis for allocating recruitment, accepted travel allocation subject to identification of hotel charges for 10A projects, upheld software-license allocation, but sustained AO&#039;s turnover-based allocation for communication costs. Classification of computer software (revenue v. capital) was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 401 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257465</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s transfer-pricing contentions: OP/total-cost PLI was fixed at 9% (not 6.88%). Several alleged comparables were excluded for lack of functional similarity or segmental data, while one comparable was retained; transfer-pricing addition was restricted to Rs. 17,32,27,953. For international support-services the Tribunal found the prices were at arm&#039;s length and disallowed adjustment. On Sec.10A deductions the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s employee-count basis for allocating recruitment, accepted travel allocation subject to identification of hotel charges for 10A projects, upheld software-license allocation, but sustained AO&#039;s turnover-based allocation for communication costs. Classification of computer software (revenue v. capital) was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>