<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (2) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168566</link>
    <description>Under the Factories Act, 1948, the duties to maintain a register of adult workers and ensure consistency with working-hour notices apply only to persons employed in the factory under a contract of service and subject to the management&#039;s control and supervision. Applying that test, independent contractors who manufacture bidis on their own account are not &quot;workers&quot; merely because they supply goods to the factory, and their coolies are likewise outside the definition where they are engaged by the contractor, not the factory. In such circumstances, omission of their names from the register does not amount to a breach attracting liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (2) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168566</link>
      <description>Under the Factories Act, 1948, the duties to maintain a register of adult workers and ensure consistency with working-hour notices apply only to persons employed in the factory under a contract of service and subject to the management&#039;s control and supervision. Applying that test, independent contractors who manufacture bidis on their own account are not &quot;workers&quot; merely because they supply goods to the factory, and their coolies are likewise outside the definition where they are engaged by the contractor, not the factory. In such circumstances, omission of their names from the register does not amount to a breach attracting liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>