https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168564 Where the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 creates a special right and a complete enforcement machinery, civil court jurisdiction is impliedly excluded for claims seeking enforcement of rights under that Act. A representative suit could not be maintained to enforce rights arising from a settlement under section 18(1) because the asserted interests did not rest on a common civil basis for all claimants. A permanent injunction was also unavailable, as the settlement was determinable and the relief would have required preserving inconsistent settlements through ordinary civil proceedings. The disputes therefore fell within the exclusive statutory forum under the Industrial Disputes Act. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:57:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168564 Where the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 creates a special right and a complete enforcement machinery, civil court jurisdiction is impliedly excluded for claims seeking enforcement of rights under that Act. A representative suit could not be maintained to enforce rights arising from a settlement under section 18(1) because the asserted interests did not rest on a common civil basis for all claimants. A permanent injunction was also unavailable, as the settlement was determinable and the relief would have required preserving inconsistent settlements through ordinary civil proceedings. The disputes therefore fell within the exclusive statutory forum under the Industrial Disputes Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168564