<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 378 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257442</link>
    <description>Duty could not be demanded on an alleged intermediate woollen fabric where shawls were woven directly from yarn in running length with dividing lines only for cutting, packing and marketing. No evidence showed any separate fabric came into existence at an intermediate stage, and an earlier Tribunal decision on similar facts was applied. On that basis, the demand on the supposed intermediate product was found unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 378 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257442</link>
      <description>Duty could not be demanded on an alleged intermediate woollen fabric where shawls were woven directly from yarn in running length with dividing lines only for cutting, packing and marketing. No evidence showed any separate fabric came into existence at an intermediate stage, and an earlier Tribunal decision on similar facts was applied. On that basis, the demand on the supposed intermediate product was found unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>