<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257438</link>
    <description>Import of E-rickshaws in CKD condition without batteries required fresh examination to determine whether the goods were to be treated as new vehicles under Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 87 of the Import Export Policy 2014, which would trigger the type approval certificate requirement under Rule 126. Because the matter had already been remanded, the remand was converted into an open remand so the original adjudicating authority could decide the applicability of Rule 126 independently and without being bound by earlier directions. The question of compliance was therefore left for fresh determination at the adjudication stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257438</link>
      <description>Import of E-rickshaws in CKD condition without batteries required fresh examination to determine whether the goods were to be treated as new vehicles under Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 87 of the Import Export Policy 2014, which would trigger the type approval certificate requirement under Rule 126. Because the matter had already been remanded, the remand was converted into an open remand so the original adjudicating authority could decide the applicability of Rule 126 independently and without being bound by earlier directions. The question of compliance was therefore left for fresh determination at the adjudication stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>