<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 357 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257421</link>
    <description>An addition for alleged inflated production cost and suppressed closing stock was held unsustainable where the audited sales and consumption figures were reconcilable and the assessee had sold components and spares, including inputs removed as such in after-sales service. Supporting invoices and excise records were available, and the Assessing Officer brought no material to show double claiming of the same material or unreliability of the books and stock records. As the addition rested only on suspicion and not on any established discrepancy in the documentary record, the deletion by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 357 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257421</link>
      <description>An addition for alleged inflated production cost and suppressed closing stock was held unsustainable where the audited sales and consumption figures were reconcilable and the assessee had sold components and spares, including inputs removed as such in after-sales service. Supporting invoices and excise records were available, and the Assessing Officer brought no material to show double claiming of the same material or unreliability of the books and stock records. As the addition rested only on suspicion and not on any established discrepancy in the documentary record, the deletion by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>