<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (5) TMI 27 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168544</link>
    <description>A recurring payment under a personal covenant, even when secured by a charge on land, was treated as taxable income rather than agricultural income. The payment did not constitute rent or revenue derived from land, because it arose from the covenant itself and not from land use or ownership. It was also not characterised as an instalment of a capital sum; the transfer of the estate in exchange for a life annuity showed that the periodic receipts were intended as income in the recipient&#039;s hands. The charging provision&#039;s word &quot;income&quot; was not confined by &quot;profits and gains&quot;, and a periodical monetary return from a definite source fell within it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:47:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (5) TMI 27 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168544</link>
      <description>A recurring payment under a personal covenant, even when secured by a charge on land, was treated as taxable income rather than agricultural income. The payment did not constitute rent or revenue derived from land, because it arose from the covenant itself and not from land use or ownership. It was also not characterised as an instalment of a capital sum; the transfer of the estate in exchange for a life annuity showed that the periodic receipts were intended as income in the recipient&#039;s hands. The charging provision&#039;s word &quot;income&quot; was not confined by &quot;profits and gains&quot;, and a periodical monetary return from a definite source fell within it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>