<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 341 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168534</link>
    <description>Section 6 of the Kerala Forest Produce (Fixation of Selling Price) Act, 1978 was upheld as a valid classification because the exemption was confined to specified Government-owned companies and limited co-operative societies, was available only in public interest, and had a rational nexus with the Act&#039;s economic objective of fixing a minimum selling price for forest produce. The exemption notification issued under that provision was also sustained, as it was shown to have been made within the statutory power and consistent with the policy of the Act. The High Court&#039;s contrary view on Article 14 and the notification was set aside, and the challenge to the statutory exemption failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 341 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168534</link>
      <description>Section 6 of the Kerala Forest Produce (Fixation of Selling Price) Act, 1978 was upheld as a valid classification because the exemption was confined to specified Government-owned companies and limited co-operative societies, was available only in public interest, and had a rational nexus with the Act&#039;s economic objective of fixing a minimum selling price for forest produce. The exemption notification issued under that provision was also sustained, as it was shown to have been made within the statutory power and consistent with the policy of the Act. The High Court&#039;s contrary view on Article 14 and the notification was set aside, and the challenge to the statutory exemption failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>